Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
03-ORD-032
Request By: Larry Tyus 400 South Sixth Street Louisville, KY 40202Suzanne Cordery, General Counsel Jefferson County Corrections 400 South Sixth Street Louisville, KY 40202 Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. …
Larry Tyus — Louisville Metropolitan Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
04-ORD-027
Opinion Opinion By: Gregory D. Stumbo, Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Grant County Detention Center violated the Open Records Act in failing to …
Christopher Estep — Grant County Detention Center
Open Records Decision —
05-ORD-178
Opinion Opinion By: Gregory D. Stumbo,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Louisville Metropolitan Department of Corrections violated the Open Records …
Juan F. Escobedo — Louisville Metropolitan Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
08-ORD-170
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Michelle D. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision At issue in this appeal is whether the Grant County Detention Center violated the Kentucky Open Records Act in denying Terry …
Terry Whittaker — Grant County Detention Center
Open Records Decision —
10-ORD-154
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Michelle D. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision At issue in this appeal is whether the Grant County Detention Center violated the Kentucky Open Records Act in the disposition …
William K. Glover — Grant County Detention Center
Open Records Decision —
13-ORD-022
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Louisville Metropolitan Department of Corrections ("LMDC") violated the …
Ben Richard, Jr. — Louisville Metropolitan Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
13-ORD-032
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Louisville Metropolitan Department of Corrections ("LMDC") violated the …
Philip J. Edwards — Louisville Metropolitan Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
14-ORD-159
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Eric Cunningham appeals the alleged failure of the Louisville Metropolitan Department of Corrections to respond to his June 26, …
Eric Cunningham — Louisville Metropolitan Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
18-ORD-151
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear, Attorney General; Gordon Slone, Assistant Attorney General Summary : The record on appeal does not contain sufficient information for this office to resolve the factual dispute between the requester and the Grant …
Grant Axon — Grant County Detention Center
Open Records Decision —
19-ORD-222
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear, Attorney General; Michelle D. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Grant County Detention Center ("GCDC") violated the Open Records Act in …
Hanif Yazid — Grant County Detention Center
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-025
25-ORD-025 January 29, 2025 In re: Austyn Ponce/Grant County Detention Center Summary: The Grant County Detention Center (“the Center”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to timely respond to a request under the Act. Open …
Austyn Ponce — Grant County Detention Center
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.