Search AG Opinions & Decisions
24-ORD-085
24-ORD-084 March 22, 2024 In re: David Borum/Kentucky Board of Cosmetology Summary: The Kentucky Board of Cosmetology (“the Board”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied part of a request to inspect records under KRS 61.872(6) …
David Borum — Kentucky Board of Cosmetology
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-115
24-ORD-115 May 8, 2024 In re: WDRB News/Transportation Cabinet Summary: The Transportation Cabinet (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to meet its burden to support redacting information from records relating to …
WDRB News — Transportation Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-129
24-ORD-129 May 24, 2024 In re: Courtney Graham/Kentucky Board of Cosmetology Summary: The Kentucky Board of Cosmetology (the “Board”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not fulfill a request for records within five business days …
Courtney Graham — Kentucky Board of Cosmetology
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-132
24-ORD-132 May 31, 2024 In re: Cody Glenn/Transportation Cabinet Summary: The Transportation Cabinet (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it could not provide records that do not exist. Open Records Decision On April …
Cody Glenn — Transportation Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-167
24-ORD-167 July 29, 2024 In re: Christopher Hunt/Kentucky Board of Cosmetology Summary: The Kentucky Board of Cosmetology (“the Board”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records within five …
Christopher Hunt — Kentucky Board of Cosmetology
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.