Search AG Opinions & Decisions

23-ORD-007
23-ORD-007 January 18, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/ Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision …
Lawrence Trageser — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-027
23-ORD-027 February 7, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: This Office cannot find the Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided what the requester considers …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-037
23-ORD-037 February 16, 2023 In re: Eric Hermansen/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: To invoke the Attorney General’s statutory authority to review an agency’s response to a request submitted under the Open Records Act (“the Act”), the requester …
Eric Hermansen — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-038
23-ORD-038 February 20, 2023 In re: Alan Rubin / Louisville Metro Government Summary: Because the requester has made a prima facie case that a public record should exist, Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the …
Alan Rubin — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-062
23-ORD-062 March 20, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: This Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provides proof it timely issued …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-069
23-ORD-069 March 27, 2023 In re: Deon’tae Williams/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist in its …
Deon’tae Williams — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-087
23-ORD-087 April 17, 2023 In re: Western States Media/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for automobile collision reports under KRS …
Western States Media — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-089
23-ORD-089 April 18, 2023 In re: Corey Wooley/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request under KRS 197.025(1) for security …
Corey Wooley — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-105
23-ORD-105 May 8, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it issued a timely response to a request to inspect records. …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-111
23-ORD-111 May 22, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not subvert the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it …
Lawrence Trageser — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-135
23-ORD-135 June 13, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to make a timely response to two open records requests. Open …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-138
23-ORD-138 June 20, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue responses within five business days of receiving requests …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-186
23-ORD-186 July 26, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office is unable to find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request for …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-193
23-ORD-193 August 1, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to resolve the …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-207
23-ORD-207 August 9, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld a “preliminary draft” under KRS 61.878(1)(i). Open Records …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-253
23-ORD-253 September 19, 2023 In re: Bill Hollander/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records …
Bill Hollander — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-292
23-ORD-292 November 1, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Metro also violated …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-319
23-ORD-319 December 5, 2023 In re: Glenn D. Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because it cannot resolve the factual …
Glenn D. Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-333
23-ORD-333 December 14, 2023 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its final response …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-334
23-ORD-334 December 14, 2023 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its final response …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.

Year

Agency

Requested By