Search AG Opinions & Decisions
23-ORD-069
23-ORD-069 March 27, 2023 In re: Deon’tae Williams/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist in its …
Deon’tae Williams — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-087
23-ORD-087 April 17, 2023 In re: Western States Media/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for automobile collision reports under KRS …
Western States Media — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-089
23-ORD-089 April 18, 2023 In re: Corey Wooley/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request under KRS 197.025(1) for security …
Corey Wooley — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-105
23-ORD-105 May 8, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it issued a timely response to a request to inspect records. …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-111
23-ORD-111 May 22, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not subvert the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it …
Lawrence Trageser — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-135
23-ORD-135 June 13, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to make a timely response to two open records requests. Open …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-138
23-ORD-138 June 20, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue responses within five business days of receiving requests …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-186
23-ORD-186 July 26, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office is unable to find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request for …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-193
23-ORD-193 August 1, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to resolve the …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-207
23-ORD-207 August 9, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld a “preliminary draft” under KRS 61.878(1)(i). Open Records …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-253
23-ORD-253 September 19, 2023 In re: Bill Hollander/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records …
Bill Hollander — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-292
23-ORD-292 November 1, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Metro also violated …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-319
23-ORD-319 December 5, 2023 In re: Glenn D. Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because it cannot resolve the factual …
Glenn D. Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-333
23-ORD-333 December 14, 2023 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its final response …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-334
23-ORD-334 December 14, 2023 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its final response …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-346
23-ORD-346 December 28, 2023 In re: Nicolas Horne/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it delayed access to …
Nicolas Horne — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-006
24-ORD-006 January 16, 2024 In re: Reginald Grider/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“Penitentiary”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its …
Reginald Grider — Kentucky State Penitentiary
24-ORD-008
24-OR-008 January 17, 2024 In re: Jessica Thornton/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of a privileged memorandum from its attorney to …
Jessica Thornton — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-012
24-ORD-012 January 17, 2024 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision On …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-016
24-ORD-016 January 22, 2024 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld an email that was exempt from disclosure under KRS …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.