Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
14-ORD-227
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway,Attorney General;Amye L. Bensenhaver,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Glenn Odom appeals Kentucky State Penitentiary's handling of his September 8 and 10, 2014 open records requests for copies of all …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
16-ORD-022
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision At issue in this appeal is whether the Kentucky State Penitentiary ("KSP") violated the Kentucky Open Records Act in denying inmate …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
18-ORD-238
Opinion Opinion By: Andy BeshearAttorney General;Gordon SloneAssistant Attorney General Open Records Decision At issue in this appeal is whether Kentucky State Penitentiary violated the Open Records Act by denying a request for a color copy of a …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-163
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 13, 2021, Glenn Odom ("Appellant") submitted to the Penitentiary a request for records related to the Penitentiary placing …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-171
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 27, 2021, inmate Glenn Odom ("Appellant") requested a copy of all the "legal material request forms that [he] gave to …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-027
23-ORD-027 February 7, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: This Office cannot find the Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided what the requester considers …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-062
23-ORD-062 March 20, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: This Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provides proof it timely issued …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-105
23-ORD-105 May 8, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it issued a timely response to a request to inspect records. …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-186
23-ORD-186 July 26, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office is unable to find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request for …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-193
23-ORD-193 August 1, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to resolve the …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
24-ORD-082
24-ORD-082 March 20, 2024 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office is unable to find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to resolve …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-006
25-ORD-006 January 7, 2025 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided all responsive records it possesses. Open …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.