Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-168
24-ORD-168 July 30, 2024 In re: Randal Kiper/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do not contain a …
Randal Kiper — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-263
24-ORD-263 December 9, 2024 In re: Carl Adkins/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for JPay emails between private …
Carl Adkins — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-006
25-ORD-006 January 7, 2025 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided all responsive records it possesses. Open …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-024
25-ORD-024 January 28, 2025 In re: Karim Zein/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to cite the specific exception authorizing the …
Karim Zein — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-048
25-ORD-048 February 18, 2025 In re: Jackie Jerome/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that are exempt under …
Jackie Jerome — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.