Search AG Opinions & Decisions
23-ORD-087
23-ORD-087 April 17, 2023 In re: Western States Media/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for automobile collision reports under KRS …
Western States Media — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-088
23-ORD-088 April 18, 2023 In re: Ben Richard/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (“Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request seeking information rather than …
Ben Richard — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
23-ORD-100
23-ORD-100 May 1, 2023 In re: Rusty Weddle/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld records pertaining to an investigation …
Rusty Weddle — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
23-ORD-108
23-ORD-108 May 8, 2023 In re: Leslie Haun/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided records it deemed responsive to an open …
Leslie Haun — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
23-ORD-135
23-ORD-135 June 13, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to make a timely response to two open records requests. Open …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-138
23-ORD-138 June 20, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue responses within five business days of receiving requests …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-146
23-ORD-146 June 29, 2023 In re: William Cope/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (the “Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records without adequately …
William Cope — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
23-ORD-183
23-ORD-183 July 25, 2023 In re: Hal Cobb/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records without stating …
Hal Cobb — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
23-ORD-207
23-ORD-207 August 9, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld a “preliminary draft” under KRS 61.878(1)(i). Open Records …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-214
23-ORD-214 August 14, 2023 In re: Leslie Haun/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (the “Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that are exempt …
Leslie Haun — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
23-ORD-253
23-ORD-253 September 19, 2023 In re: Bill Hollander/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records …
Bill Hollander — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-288
23-ORD-288 October 25, 2023 In re: James A. Campbell/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an inmate’s request for a …
James A. Campbell — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
23-ORD-292
23-ORD-292 November 1, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Metro also violated …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-333
23-ORD-333 December 14, 2023 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its final response …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-334
23-ORD-334 December 14, 2023 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its final response …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-346
23-ORD-346 December 28, 2023 In re: Nicolas Horne/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it delayed access to …
Nicolas Horne — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-008
24-OR-008 January 17, 2024 In re: Jessica Thornton/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of a privileged memorandum from its attorney to …
Jessica Thornton — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-012
24-ORD-012 January 17, 2024 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision On …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-016
24-ORD-016 January 22, 2024 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld an email that was exempt from disclosure under KRS …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-015
24-ORD-015 January 22, 2024 In re: Evan Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”) within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it delayed access to records …
Evan Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.