Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-090
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Inmate Deon'tae Williams ("the Appellant") submitted a request to the Penitentiary to inspect two specific incident reports--one …
Deon’tae Williams — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-108
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On April 8, 2022, inmate Deon'tae Williams ("Appellant") made a request to the Kentucky State Penitentiary ("the Penitentiary") …
Deon’tae Williams — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-069
23-ORD-069 March 27, 2023 In re: Deon’tae Williams/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist in its …
Deon’tae Williams — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-237
24-ORD-237 November 12, 2024 In re: Alex Rib/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it required the Appellant to complete a commercial purpose form even though …
Alex Rib — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-272
24-ORD-272 December 23, 2024 In re: Alex Rib/City of Anchorage Summary: The City of Anchorage (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it made redactions to a public record without citing an applicable exception to the Act and …
Alex Rib — City of Anchorage
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.