Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-179
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Austin Horn ("Appellant") asked the Foundation to provide copies of records related to payments made to a specific individual for a …
Austin Horn — Kentucky State University Foundation
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-141
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On April 24, 2022, Spencer Stone ("Appellant") requested "copies of all records used to determine the outcome" of two …
Spencer Stone — Board of Examiners of Psychology
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-139
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On April 25, 2022, Spencer Stone ("Appellant") requested "copies of all records used to determine the outcome" of a specific …
Spencer Stone — Board of Social Work
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-140
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On April 23, 2022, Spencer Stone ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Court for copies of all family court judges' schedules …
Spencer Stone — Jefferson County Family Court
24-ORD-048
24-ORD-048 February 28, 2024 In re: Austin Horn/Office of the Governor Summary: The Office of the Governor (“the agency”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request as too imprecise and unreasonably burdensome. Open Records …
Austin Horn — Office of the Governor
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.