Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
98-ORD-097
Request By: [NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL] Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Cabinet for Families and …
WHAS-11 — Cabinet for Families and Children
Open Records Decision —
98-ORD-116
Request By: [NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL] Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the University of Louisville …
WHAS-11 — University of Louisville
Open Records Decision —
01-ORD-122
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the City of Louisville Division of Police violated provisions of the …
WHAS-11 — City of Louisville Division of Police
Open Records Decision —
02-ORD-012
Request By: Mark Hebert 520 W. Chestnut Street Louisville, KY 40202Rande Swan Regional Airport Authority P.O. Box 9129 Louisville, KY 40209-0129T. Kennedy Helm, III Stites & Harbison Providian Tower 400 W. Market Street, Ste. 1800 Louisville, KY …
WHAS-11 — Louisville and Jefferson County Regional Airport Authority
Open Records Decision —
02-ORD-097
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the City of Louisville properly denied WHAS-11 reporter Mark …
WHAS-11 — City of Louisville
Open Records Decision —
02-ORD-222
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III,Attorney General;Amye L. Bensenhaver,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether Seven Counties Services, Inc., violated the Open Records Act in denying …
WHAS-11 — Seven Counties Services, Inc.
Open Records Decision —
02-ORD-231
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Justice Cabinet violated the Open Records Act in denying WHAS-11 …
WHAS-11 — Justice Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
05-ORD-280
Opinion Opinion By: Gregory D. Stumbo,Attorney General;Amye L. Bensenhaver,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Transportation Cabinet violated the Open Records Act in partially …
WHAS-11 — Transportation Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
18-ORD-082
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear, Attorney General; Gordon Slone, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether Roederer Correctional Complex ("RCC") violated the Kentucky Open Records Act in its …
Christopher Peyton — Roederer Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
18-ORD-115
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Kentucky State Police ("KSP") violated the Open Records Act in its disposition …
WHAS-11 — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
18-ORD-208
Request By: Christopher Peyton # 283628 D. Brandon Ison, Esq. Pammy Whitt Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear, Attorney General; J. Marcus Jones, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the …
Christopher Peyton — Morgan County Commonwealth’s Attorney
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-095
25-ORD-095 April 3, 2025 In re: Christopher Peyton/Roederer Correctional Complex Summary: The Roederer Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response within five business days of …
Christopher Peyton — Roederer Correctional Complex
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.