Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-068
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 1, 2022, David Webster ("Appellant") requested that the Board provide "any and all information dealing with Ford." …
David Webster — Christian County Board of Education
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-112
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On April 13, 2022, David Webster ("Appellant") requested that the Board provide "any and all communications between [Christian …
David Webster — Christian County Board of Education
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-121
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On April 26, 2022, David Webster ("Appellant") requested inspection of a "2007-2008 letter" to the Board from the Hopkinsville …
David Webster — Christian County Board of Education
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-144
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On April 9, 2022, David Webster ("Appellant") submitted a four-part request to the Board for inspection of records. At issue in …
David Webster — Christian County Board of Education
Open Meetings Decision —
22-OMD-171
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision On August 5, 2022, in a written complaint submitted under KRS 61.846(1), David Webster ("Appellant") alleged that the Board had …
David Webster — Christian County Board of Education
23-ORD-250
23-ORD-250 September 19, 2023 In re: David Webster/Christian County Board of Education Summary: The Christian County Board of Education (“the Board”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it initially failed to explain how exceptions to the …
David Webster — Christian County Board of Education
23-ORD-269
23-ORD-269 October 10, 2023 In re: David Webster/Christian County Board of Education Summary: The Christian County Board of Education (“the Board”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to notify the requester that records did not …
David Webster — Christian County Board of Education
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-002
25-ORD-002 January 2, 2025 In re: Jerry Eldridge/Little Sandy Correctional Complex Summary: The Little Sandy Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it could not provide records it had not created. …
Jerry Eldridge — Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-012
25-ORD-012 January 13, 2025 In re: David Webster/Christian County Public Schools Summary: Christian County Public Schools (“CCPS”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it did not respond …
David Webster — Christian County Public Schools
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-026
25-ORD-026 January 30, 2025 In re: Jerry Eldridge/Little Sandy Correctional Complex Summary: The Office lacks jurisdiction to consider a complaint alleging that the Little Sandy Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act …
Jerry Eldridge — Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-080
25-ORD-080 March 25, 2025 In re: David Webster/Christian County Public Schools Summary: Christian County Public Schools (“CCPS”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld communications between staff and Board members that …
David Webster — Christian County Public Schools
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.