Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
08-ORD-256
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently …
James David Adkins — Ohio County Pretrial Services
Open Records Decision —
08-ORD-257
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the actions of the Ohio County Detention Center (OCDC) relative to James David …
James David Adkins — Ohio County Detention Center
Open Records Decision —
09-ORD-013
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether DeAM-RON Building Systems, Inc., a manufacturer of prestressed concrete, violated …
James David Adkins — DeAM-RON Building Systems, Inc.
Open Records Decision —
09-ORD-032
Request By: James David Adkins # 217329 Gerry ("Rip") Wright Gregory B. Hill, Esq. Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether …
James David Adkins — Ohio County Detention Center
Open Records Decision —
09-ORD-045
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently …
James David Adkins — Ohio Circuit Court Clerk
Open Records Decision —
09-ORD-042
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether AT&T Mobility Corporation (AT&T) violated the Open Records Act in the disposition …
James David Adkins — AT&T Mobility Corporation
23-ORD-134
23-ORD-134 June 13, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government & Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Ethics Commission Summary: Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government (“Metro”) and the …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government & Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Ethics Commission
23-ORD-135
23-ORD-135 June 13, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to make a timely response to two open records requests. Open …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-237
23-ORD-237 September 11, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government & Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Ethics Commission Summary: Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government (“Metro”) and the …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government & Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Ethics Commission
23-ORD-274
23-ORD-274 October 18, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Summary: The Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response to a …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.