Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
11-ORD-144
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye Bensenhaver, Amye Bensenhaver Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Office of the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being …
William E. Sharp — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
11-ORD-152
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Office of the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General …
William E. Sharp — University of Louisville
Open Records Decision —
11-ORD-157
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision As a threshold matter, we address UMC's argument that the Office of the Attorney General "lacks the statutory authority under …
William E. Sharp — University Medical Center, Inc.
Open Records Decision —
11-ORD-185
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently …
William E. Sharp — Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Division of Police
Open Records Decision —
14-ORD-218
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway,Attorney General;Amye L. Bensenhaver,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision William E. Sharp appeals the partial denial of his September 09, 2014 open records request to the Office of the Shelby County …
William E. Sharp — Office of the Shelby County Attorney
Open Meetings Decision —
25-OMD-110
25-OMD-110 April 30, 2025 In re: Jason O’Bannon/London City Council Summary: In appeals to the Office under the Open Meetings Act (“the Act”), the Office cannot resolve factual disputes or determine the credibility of witnesses. Accordingly, the …
Jason O’Bannon — London City Council
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-144
25-ORD-144 June 4, 2025 In re: Jason O’Bannon/City of London Summary: The City of London (“the City”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it stated that it does not possess records responsive to the Appellant’s request and …
Jason O’Bannon — City of London
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.