Search AG Opinions & Decisions
23-ORD-070
23-ORD-070 March 27, 2023 In re: Jeffrey Jobe/Boys and Girls Club of Glasgow Summary: In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Boys and Girls Club of Glasgow (“the Club”) is a “public agency” subject to the Open Records Act (“the Act”) under …
Jeffrey Jobe — Boys and Girls Club of Glasgow
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-198
24-ORD-198 September 17, 2024 In re: Jeffrey Jobe/Bridge Kentucky, Inc. Summary: Bridge Kentucky, Inc. (“Bridge”) is a public agency subject to the Open Records Act (“the Act”) that must produce nonexempt, responsive records from fiscal years in …
Jeffrey Jobe — Bridge Kentucky, Inc.
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-197
24-ORD-197 September 17, 2024 In re: Jeffrey Jobe/Boys and Girls Club of Glasgow/Barren County Summary: The Boys and Girls Club of Glasgow/Barren County (“the Club”) is a public agency subject to the Open Records Act (“the Act”) that must produce …
Jeffrey Jobe — Boys and Girls Club of Glasgow
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-042
25-ORD-042 February 13, 2025 In re: Joseph Childers/University of Kentucky Summary: The University of Kentucky (“the University”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a voluminous request for records because it would place …
Joseph Childers — University of Kentucky
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-047
25-ORD-047 February 18, 2025 In re: Joseph Childers/University of Kentucky Summary: The University of Kentucky (“the University”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records under KRS 61.872(6) because it did not …
Joseph Childers — University of Kentucky
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.