Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-206
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Kyle Thompson ("Appellant") requested copies from the Clerk of certain grand jury records of the Hardin Circuit Court. After …
Kyle Thompson — Hardin Circuit Court Clerk
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-215
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Kyle Thompson ("Appellant") requested certain records from the Clerk relating to his grand jury proceedings before the Hardin …
Kyle Thompson — Hardin Circuit Court Clerk
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-230
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Kyle Thompson ("Appellant") requested copies from the Clerk of certain grand jury records of the Hardin Circuit Court. The Clerk …
Kyle Thompson — Hardin Circuit Court Clerk
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-119
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Inmate Kyle Thompson ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Reformatory for "a copy of the memo from 11/14/2018," which he …
Kyle Thompson — Kentucky State Reformatory
23-ORD-070
23-ORD-070 March 27, 2023 In re: Jeffrey Jobe/Boys and Girls Club of Glasgow Summary: In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Boys and Girls Club of Glasgow (“the Club”) is a “public agency” subject to the Open Records Act (“the Act”) under …
Jeffrey Jobe — Boys and Girls Club of Glasgow
23-ORD-272
23-ORD-272 October 10, 2023 In re: Kyle Thompson/Little Sandy Correctional Complex Summary: The Little Sandy Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an inmate’s request to inspect records without …
Kyle Thompson — Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-173
24-ORD-173 July 30, 2024 In re: Kyle Thompson/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Office cannot find that the Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a …
Kyle Thompson — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-198
24-ORD-198 September 17, 2024 In re: Jeffrey Jobe/Bridge Kentucky, Inc. Summary: Bridge Kentucky, Inc. (“Bridge”) is a public agency subject to the Open Records Act (“the Act”) that must produce nonexempt, responsive records from fiscal years in …
Jeffrey Jobe — Bridge Kentucky, Inc.
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-197
24-ORD-197 September 17, 2024 In re: Jeffrey Jobe/Boys and Girls Club of Glasgow/Barren County Summary: The Boys and Girls Club of Glasgow/Barren County (“the Club”) is a public agency subject to the Open Records Act (“the Act”) that must produce …
Jeffrey Jobe — Boys and Girls Club of Glasgow
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-257
24-ORD-257 December 3, 2024 In re: Kyle Thompson/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Office cannot find that the Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (the “Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot …
Kyle Thompson — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-015
25-ORD-015 January 15, 2025 In re: Kyle Thompson/Little Sandy Correctional Complex Summary: The Little Sandy Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an inmate’s request for employee emails …
Kyle Thompson — Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-065
25-ORD-065 March 17, 2025 In re: Kyle Thompson/Little Sandy Correctional Complex Summary: The Office cannot find that the Little Sandy Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve …
Kyle Thompson — Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.