Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
93-ORD-091
Opinion Opinion By: Chris Gorman, Attorney General; Amye B. Majors, Assistant Attorney General OPEN RECORDS DECISION This matter comes to the Attorney General on appeal from the Transportation Cabinet's denial of Mr. Mark Hebert's June 28, 1993, …
Mark Hebert — Transportation Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
97-ORD-121
Request By: [NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL] Opinion Opinion By: A. B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This is an appeal from the City of Pioneer Village's partial denial of WHAS-TV …
Mark Hebert — City of Pioneer Village
Open Records Decision —
98-ORD-106
Request By: [NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL] Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter comes to the Attorney General on appeal from the Kentucky State …
Mark Hebert — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
00-ORD-136
Request By: [NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL] Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The issue presented in this appeal is whether the Department of Insurance violated …
Mark Hebert — Department of Insurance
Open Records Decision —
01-ORD-032
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III,Attorney General;James M. Ringo,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The issue in this appeal is whether the Cabinet for Health Services (CHS) violated the Open Records Act in its actions …
Mark Hebert — Cabinet for Health Services
Open Records Decision —
01-ORD-217
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision At issue in this appeal is whether the Transportation Cabinet violated the Open Records Act in denying a request by Mark …
Mark Hebert — Transportation Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
05-ORD-027
Opinion Opinion By: Gregory D. Stumbo, Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Louisville Metro Government violated the Open Records Act in its partial …
Mark Hebert — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-206
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Kyle Thompson ("Appellant") requested copies from the Clerk of certain grand jury records of the Hardin Circuit Court. After …
Kyle Thompson — Hardin Circuit Court Clerk
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-215
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Kyle Thompson ("Appellant") requested certain records from the Clerk relating to his grand jury proceedings before the Hardin …
Kyle Thompson — Hardin Circuit Court Clerk
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-230
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Kyle Thompson ("Appellant") requested copies from the Clerk of certain grand jury records of the Hardin Circuit Court. The Clerk …
Kyle Thompson — Hardin Circuit Court Clerk
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-119
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Inmate Kyle Thompson ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Reformatory for "a copy of the memo from 11/14/2018," which he …
Kyle Thompson — Kentucky State Reformatory
23-ORD-272
23-ORD-272 October 10, 2023 In re: Kyle Thompson/Little Sandy Correctional Complex Summary: The Little Sandy Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an inmate’s request to inspect records without …
Kyle Thompson — Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-173
24-ORD-173 July 30, 2024 In re: Kyle Thompson/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Office cannot find that the Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a …
Kyle Thompson — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-257
24-ORD-257 December 3, 2024 In re: Kyle Thompson/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Office cannot find that the Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (the “Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot …
Kyle Thompson — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-015
25-ORD-015 January 15, 2025 In re: Kyle Thompson/Little Sandy Correctional Complex Summary: The Little Sandy Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an inmate’s request for employee emails …
Kyle Thompson — Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-065
25-ORD-065 March 17, 2025 In re: Kyle Thompson/Little Sandy Correctional Complex Summary: The Office cannot find that the Little Sandy Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve …
Kyle Thompson — Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.