Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
96-ORD-057
Request By: [NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL] Opinion Opinion By: A. B. CHANDLER III, ATTORNEY GENERAL; JAMES M. RINGO, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL OPEN RECORDS DECISION This matter comes to the Attorney General on appeal from the Boyle County Health …
Richard Clay — Boyle County Health Department
Open Meetings Decision —
00-OMD-142
Request By: [NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL] Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Harrodsburg City Commission …
Richard Clay — Harrodsburg City Commission
Open Records Decision —
00-ORD-151
Request By: [NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL] Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the City of Harrodsburg violated …
Richard Clay — City of Harrodsburg
Open Meetings Decision —
00-OMD-154
Request By: [NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL] Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye Bensenhaver, Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this open meetings appeal is whether the Harrodsburg City …
Richard Clay — Harrodsburg City Commission
Open Records Decision —
01-ORD-114
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Danville Department of Public Safety's Division of Police, …
Richard Clay — Danville Department of Public Safety’s Division of Police
Open Records Decision —
01-ORD-136
Request By: Richard Clay 319 West Main Street P.O. Box 1256 Danville, KY 40423Sandy Gooch City Clerk/Treasurer City of Stanford 305 East Main Street Stanford, KY 40484Carol Hill Stanford City Attorney 305 East Main Street Stanford, KY 40484 Opinion …
Richard Clay — City of Stanford
Open Records Decision —
02-ORD-004
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Department for Medicaid Services violated the Open Records Act …
Richard Clay — Department for Medicaid Services
Open Records Decision —
02-ORD-026
Request By: Richard Clay 319 W. Main Street P.O. Box 1256 Danville KY 40423Deborah Garrison Department of Public Advocacy 100 Fair Oaks Lane, Ste. 302 Frankfort KY 40601Larry D. Beale General Counsel Department of Public Advocacy 100 Fair Oaks Lane, …
Richard Clay — Department of Public Advocacy
Open Meetings Decision —
03-OMD-197
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III,Attorney General;Amye L. Bensenhaver,Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Danville Board of Ethics violated the Open Meetings Act by failing …
Richard Clay — Danville Board of Ethics
Open Records Decision —
05-ORD-131
Opinion Opinion By: Gregory D. Stumbo, Attorney General; Michelle D. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision At issue in this appeal is whether the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet violated the Kentucky Open Records Act in denying …
Richard Clay — Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
05-ORD-202
Request By: Richard Clay Clay & Clay 319 West Main Street Danville, KY 40422Warden James L. Morgan Northpoint Training Center Box 479 Burgin, KY 40310Marilene Rowland Offender Records Custodian Northpoint Training Center Box 479 Burgin, KY …
Richard Clay — Northpoint Training Center
Open Records Decision —
13-ORD-161
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Kentucky State Police violated the Open Records Act in responding to …
Richard Clay — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-123
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 10, 2022, Sebastian Kitchen ("Appellant") requested the Department provide "[a]ny and all records and or email …
Sebastian Kitchen — Department of Agriculture
22-ORD-204
22-ORD-204 October 6, 2022 In re: Sebastian Kitchen/Department of Agriculture Summary: The Department of Agriculture (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to explain how specific exemptions applied to the …
Sebastian Kitchen — Department of Agriculture
22-ORD-263
22-ORD-263 December 12, 2022 In re: Sebastian Kitchen/Office of Attorney General Summary: The Office of Attorney General (“the Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when its response to a request to inspect records complied with …
Sebastian Kitchen — Office of Attorney General
22-ORD-264
22-ORD-264 December 12, 2022 In re: Sebastian Kitchen/Office of Attorney General Summary: The Office of Attorney General (“the Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when its response to a request to inspect records complied with …
Sebastian Kitchen — Office of Attorney General
22-ORD-262
22-ORD-262 December 12, 2022 In re: Sebastian Kitchen/Office of Attorney General Summary: The Office of Attorney General (“the Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when its response to a request to inspect records complied with …
Sebastian Kitchen — Office of Attorney General
23-ORD-034
23-ORD-034 February 15, 2023 In re: Sebastian Kitchen/Kentucky Department of Agriculture Summary: The Kentucky Department of Agriculture (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect …
Sebastian Kitchen — Kentucky Department of Agriculture
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.