Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
07-ORD-162
Opinion Opinion By: Gregory D. Stumbo, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Kentucky State Police violated the Open Records Act, within the …
The Cincinnati Enquirer — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
14-ORD-211
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Commonwealth's Attorney for Boone and Gallatin Counties, Linda Tally Smith, …
The Cincinnati Enquirer — Commonwealth’s Attorney, 54th Judicial Circuit
Open Records Decision —
15-ORD-123
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Benjamin Long, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the City of Erlanger violated the Open Records Act in denying Cincinnati Enquirer …
The Cincinnati Enquirer — City of Erlanger
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-115
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The Cincinnati Enquirer ("Appellant") submitted an open records request to the District for copies of, among other things, "[d]ocuments …
The Cincinnati Enquirer — Boone County School District
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-186
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Stephen Zoglman ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Daviess County Board of Education ("Board") seeking copies of all emails …
Stephen Zoglman — Daviess County Board of Education
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-188
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney GeneralJames M. HerrickAssistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On November 14, 2019, Stephen Zoglman ("Appellant") requested to inspect a list of the Foundation's donors. In response, the …
Stephen Zoglman — Foundation for Daviess County Public Schools, Inc.
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-093
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On April 9, 2021, Stephen Zoglman ("Appellant") asked to inspect all emails and attachments to and from the Board and a specific email …
Stephen Zoglman — Daviess County Board of Education
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-131
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On June 8, 2021, Stephen Zoglman ("Appellant") emailed a request to the City to inspect "all records related to the P3 agreement …
Stephen Zoglman — City of Owensboro
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-149
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 8, 2021, Stephen Zoglman ("Appellant") submitted to the Cabinet a request for certain records. On July 16, 2021, having received …
Stephen Zoglman — Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
23-ORD-075
23-ORD-075 March 29, 2023 In re: The Cincinnati Enquirer/City of Covington Summary: The City of Covington (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it when it withheld from inspection records that were not “preliminary drafts” …
The Cincinnati Enquirer — City of Covington
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-271
24-ORD-271 December 23, 2024 In re: The Cincinnati Enquirer/City of Newport Summary: The City of Newport (“the City”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not produce records it does not possess. Open Records Decision The …
The Cincinnati Enquirer — City of Newport
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.