Search AG Opinions & Decisions
24-ORD-001
24-ORD-001 January 12, 2024 In re: Jerry Shrecker/City of Owensboro Summary: The Office cannot find that the City of Owensboro (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request it did not receive as a …
Jerry Shrecker — City of Owensboro
24-ORD-002
24-ORD-002 January 16, 2024 In re: Daniel Owens/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it entirely withheld from an unsuccessful …
Daniel Owens — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
24-ORD-003
24-ORD-003 January 16, 2024 In re: Timothy D. Day/Kentucky Parole Board Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky Parole Board (“the Board”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do not exist. …
Timothy D. Day — Kentucky Parole Board
24-ORD-004
24-ORD-004 January 16, 2024 In re: Davon Burke/Kenton County Attorney’s Office Summary: Because a person seeking the Attorney General’s review of a denial of a request to inspect records must provide “a copy of the written request and a copy of the …
Davon Burke — Kenton County Attorney’s Office
24-ORD-006
24-ORD-006 January 16, 2024 In re: Reginald Grider/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“Penitentiary”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its …
Reginald Grider — Kentucky State Penitentiary
24-ORD-005
24-ORD-005 January 16, 2024 In re: Anthony Cain/Calloway County Jail Summary: The Calloway County Jail (“Jail”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open Records Decision Inmate Anthony …
Anthony Cain — Calloway County Jail
24-ORD-013
24-ORD-013 January 17, 2024 In re: Monty Corbett/Breathitt–Wolfe EMS, Inc. Summary: The Office is unable to find that the Breathitt–Wolfe EMS, Inc. (“the Corporation”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to find …
Monty Corbett — Breathitt–Wolfe EMS, Inc.
24-ORD-008
24-OR-008 January 17, 2024 In re: Jessica Thornton/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of a privileged memorandum from its attorney to …
Jessica Thornton — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-009
24-ORD-009 January 17, 2024 In re: Uriah Pasha/Kentucky Parole Board Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky Parole Board (“the Board”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records it …
Uriah Pasha — Kentucky Parole Board
24-ORD-012
24-ORD-012 January 17, 2024 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision On …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-OMD-007
24-OMD-007 January 17, 2024 In re: Josh Hicks/Anderson County Board of Education Summary: The Anderson County Board of Education (“the Board”) violated the Open Meetings Act (“the Act”) when it entered closed session without a motion and vote and …
Josh Hicks — Anderson County Board of Education
24-ORD-010
24-ORD-010 January 17, 2024 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown Summary: Under 40 KAR 1:030 § 4, the Attorney General may not reconsider a decision rendered under the Open Records Act (“the Act”). The Office will not reconsider 23-ORD-301, in which …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown
24-ORD-011
24-ORD-011 January 17, 2024 In re: Michael Conkright/Marshall Circuit Court Clerk Summary: The Open Records Act (“the Act”) does not apply to records of the Marshall Circuit Court Clerk (“the Clerk”). Open Records Decision On December 4, 2023, …
Michael Conkright — Marshall Circuit Court Clerk
24-ORD-018
24-ORD-018 January 22, 2024 In re: Michael R. Carter/Board of Cosmetology Summary: The Board of Cosmetology (“Board”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open Records Decision Michael …
Michael R. Carter — Board of Cosmetology
24-ORD-014
24-ORD-014 January 22, 2024 In re: Meldrum G. Harvey/Green River Correctional Complex Summary: The Green River Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that does not …
Meldrum G. Harvey — Green River Correctional Complex
24-ORD-017
24-ORD-017 January 22, 2024 In re: Michael R. Carter/Board of Cosmetology Summary: The Board of Cosmetology (“Board”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open Records Decision Michael …
Michael R. Carter — Board of Cosmetology
24-ORD-016
24-ORD-016 January 22, 2024 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld an email that was exempt from disclosure under KRS …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-015
24-ORD-015 January 22, 2024 In re: Evan Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”) within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it delayed access to records …
Evan Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-019
24-ORD-019 January 25, 2024 In re: Vivian Miles/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a timely response and failed to respond to a portion of a request. …
Vivian Miles — Kentucky State Police
24-ORD-022
24-ORD-022 January 25, 2024 In re: Kevin Zipperle/University of Louisville Athletics Association Summary: The University of Louisville Athletics Association (“the Association”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it could not …
Kevin Zipperle — University of Louisville Athletics Association
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.