Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-017
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On December 10, 2020, Jenny Patten ("Appellant") asked the Cabinet to provide "[t]he cycle virus threshold for a positive Covid19 [ …
Jenny Patten — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-034
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On December 21, 2020, Jenny Patten ("Appellant") asked the Cabinet to provide certain documents and information relating to its …
Jenny Patten — Transportation Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-047
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On January 27, 2021, Jenny Patten ("Appellant") asked the Cabinet to provide "any and all information" on several subjects. …
Jenny Patten — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-055
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Jenny Patten ("Appellant") asked the Cabinet to provide "documents, regarding the cycle virus threshold for a positive Covid19 [ sic …
Jenny Patten — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-078
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On March 16 and 18, 2021, Jenny Patten ("Appellant") asked the Cabinet to provide certain records relating to COVID-19 tests and …
Jenny Patten — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-094
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Jenny Patten ("Appellant") submitted to the Cabinet two requests for copies of records. In her first request, she asked the Cabinet to …
Jenny Patten — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-104
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Jenny Patten ("Appellant") requested from the Cabinet a list of entities performing PCR tests for the Commonwealth of Kentucky, the …
Jenny Patten — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-134
23-ORD-134 June 13, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government & Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Ethics Commission Summary: Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government (“Metro”) and the …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government & Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Ethics Commission
23-ORD-135
23-ORD-135 June 13, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to make a timely response to two open records requests. Open …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-237
23-ORD-237 September 11, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government & Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Ethics Commission Summary: Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government (“Metro”) and the …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government & Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Ethics Commission
23-ORD-274
23-ORD-274 October 18, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Summary: The Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response to a …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.