Skip to main content

Request By:

Ms. Judith G. Richardson
Attorney at Law
Brandenburg, Kentucky 40108

Opinion

Opinion By: Robert F. Stephens, Attorney General; By: Walter C. Herdman, Assistant Deputy Attorney General

This is in answer to your letter of recent date in which you raise the question as to whether or not the office of city policeman in a city of the fifth class and the position of commonwealth detective are incompatible.

Our response to your question would be in the affirmative and this has been our position in previous opinions, particularly OAG 73-488. This opinion was based upon the terms of KRS 69.110 which has subsequently been amended to change the term "district detectives" to "circuit detectives" , however the power of arrest and right to execute process as sheriffs is retained. The detectives so appointed are required to assist the commonwealth attorney in all matters pertaining to his office in the manner he designates. The specific power to appoint these detectives given to the commonwealth attorney in KRS 69.110 has however been removed as well as any reference to the length of their term of office. However, the General Assembly, in its enactment of the unified prosecutors system, has [pursuant to KRS 15.760] authorized the commonwealth attorney, with the advice and consent of the prosecutors advisory council, to appoint necessary personnel for the conduct of his office, including investigators, which would include circuit detectives referred to in KRS 69.110 otherwise considered commonwealth detectives. The fact that these detectives would [pursuant to KRS 69.110] have the power of arrest places them in the category of peace officers and public officers. Also, the fact that they are appointed by the commonwealth attorney when authorized by the council under KRS 15.760 would make them state officers.

The position of city policeman is of course a municipal office as held in numerous cases, among them being City of Lexington v. Rennick, 105 Ky. 779, 49 S.W. 787 (1899).

As you know, § 165 of the Constitution and KRS 61.080 prohibit a person from holding a state office and a municipal office at the same time. This means that in our opinion the position of commonwealth detective, appointed pursuant to the referred to statutes, would be incompatible with that of city policeman.

LLM Summary
In OAG 78-708, the Attorney General responds to an inquiry about whether the roles of city policeman and commonwealth detective are incompatible. The opinion affirms that these positions are indeed incompatible, referencing OAG 73-488 to support this view. The decision discusses the statutory framework and the roles of these positions, concluding that a person cannot hold both a state office and a municipal office simultaneously according to the Constitution and relevant statutes.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Type:
Opinion
Lexis Citation:
1978 Ky. AG LEXIS 135
Cites (Untracked):
  • OAG 73-488
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.