Skip to main content

Request By:

Ms. Norma Skoog
The Kroger Co.
1014 Vine Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45201

Opinion

Opinion By: Steven L. Beshear, Attorney General; By: Suzanne Guss, Assistant Attorney General

This is in response to your recent letter in which you asked this office for an opinion on whether a Ford Motor Co. giveaway of automobiles conducted on Kroger supermarket premises will jeopardize wine and beer licenses held by the Kroger Co. You state that, by arrangement between Kroger and Ford, customers will register for the contest at individual supermarkets and that no minimum purchase is required for registration.

Under KRS 243.500(7) a beer or wine license will be revoked or suspended if the licensee permits or sets up, conducts, or operates on licensed premises any lottery or gift enterprise. "Lottery" and "gift enterprise" are defined as a gambling scheme in which the participants pay or agree to pay consideration for chances to win something of value; the winning chances are determined by a drawing or some other method based upon chance. KRS 528.010(5).

The automobile giveaway contest you have described in your letter loes not appear to fail within the definition of a lottery or gift enterprise. In Commonwealth v. Malco-Memphis Theaters, 293 Ky. 531, 169 S.W.2d 596, 598 (1943), the Kentucky Court of Appeals stated:

". . . There can be neither legal nor moral objections to the gratuitous distribution of money or other property whether by direct gift or by selecting the donees by lot or chance. Such plan or system involves no element of gambling and is not a lottery or gift enterprise within the meaning of section 226 of our Constitution. To constitute a lottery there must be a payment of a valuable consideration for the chance to receive the prize. It is only when people are induced to give up consideration in the hope of obtaining greater returns that the law becomes concerned. . . ." (Emphasis added).

So long as the public does not pay valuable consideration for the chance to win an automobile, your "giveaway" contest will not be considered a lottery or gift enterprise. The mere act of entering the business premise to register for the contest or pick up free chances does not constitute valuable consideration. However, should the chance of winning the prize be "part of the inducement" to purchase goods, the contest would be violative of § 226 of the Kentucky Constitution and the beer or wine license subject to revocation or suspension pursuant to KRS 243.500(7). See OAG 81-146,

It is the opinion of this office that the proposed Kroger-Ford "giveaway" contest does not involve consideration and therefore complies with the laws of this Commonwealth.

LLM Summary
In OAG 81-201, the Attorney General responded to an inquiry from The Kroger Co. regarding whether a giveaway contest conducted in collaboration with Ford Motor Co. would affect their beer and wine licenses. The opinion clarified that the contest does not qualify as a lottery or gift enterprise under Kentucky law because no valuable consideration is required from participants to enter the contest. The decision references OAG 81-146 to support its conclusion that the giveaway is lawful, as it does not involve consideration and thus complies with the laws of the Commonwealth.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Type:
Opinion
Lexis Citation:
1981 Ky. AG LEXIS 234
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.