OAG 91-13 is cited in the decision to support the interpretation of KRS 160.380 regarding nepotism rules within the context of temporary appointments in school districts. The decision references OAG 91-13 to illustrate a precedent where it was determined that the employment of a spouse of an assistant principal did not violate nepotism rules, applying similar logic to the case of an acting superintendent.
OAG 91-13 was Followed by OAG 91-179
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.