Skip to main content

Request By:

Lizette Kautzmann, Chairman
Kentucky Occupational Therapy Board
P.O. Box 456
Frankfort, Kentucky 40602-0456David L. Nicholas, Director
Division of Occupations and Professions
Finance and Administration Cabinet
Berry Hill Annex
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601

Opinion

Opinion By: Chris Gorman, Attorney General; Lynne Schroering, Assistant Attorney General

After we issued OAG 92-60, you presented additional information to our office. Based on this material, we have determined that our opinion should be reissued with minor modifications. Therefore OAG 92-60 is overruled and this opinion is substituted in its place.

You have written the Attorney General for a legal opinion involving the status of occupational therapy aides. The Kentucky Occupational Therapy Board has found three sections of the occupational therapy statute regarding aides which may conflict with each other. The three statutes in question are set forth in pertinent part. KRS 319A.010(5) provides:

'Occupational therapy aide' means a person not licensed who assists in the practice of occupational therapy under the direct supervision of a licensed occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant and who is required to have an understanding of occupational therapy but is not required to have professional or advanced training in the basic anatomical, biological, psychological, and social sciences involved in the practice of occupational therapy; and

KRS 319A.080(1) provides:

It shall be unlawful for any person to practice occupational therapy or render services designated as occupational therapy in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, unless licensed under the provisions of this chapter.

KRS 319A.090 provides:

The provisions of this chapter shall not be construed as preventing or restricting the practices, services, or activities of:

* * *

(6) Any person employed as an occupational therapy aide.

The board has requested that the Attorney General address the following questions regarding these statutes:

1. Which of the above mentioned statutes prevails regarding the status of OT aides?

2. If none of the statutes absolutely prevail and they must be considered in concert, what is the status of OT aides?

3. May OT aides directly perform occupational therapy services or must their involvement in the occupational therapy process be limited to supportive activities?

The three sections from the Occupational Therapy Act which you have referenced should be read together as a whole to conform with the intent and purpose of the legislature.

Commonwealth v. Trent, Ky., 77 S.W. 390 (1903);

Seaboard Oil Company v. Commonwealth, Ky., 237 S.W. 48 (1922).

In order to evaluate the meaning of the sections we must use the general rule of statutory construction that when two interpretations of the statute are possible, one whereby the entire act is harmonious and the other whereby there is discord between the provisions, the former construction should be applied.

Bischoff v. Hennessy, Ky., 251 S.W.2d 582 (1952). Although it is possible to view these sections of KRS 319A.010, et al., as being inconsistent and contradictory, it is our opinion that the better view is that the provisions are harmonious.

The Occupational Therapy Act was created to regulate the practice of occupational therapy and to license individuals to perform the services in Kentucky. Consequently, persons not licensed or who violate the provisions of the Act are in violation of the statute and are subject to license penalization, civil penalties, or imprisonment. KRS 319A.190 and KRS 319A.990.

The exemption provisions of the Occupational Therapy Act state that the provisions of this chapter shall not be construed as preventing or restricting the practices, services, or activities of an occupational therapy aide. KRS 319A.090(6). This section must be read in conjunction with the definition of occupational therapy aide contained in KRS 319A.010(5). An aide is a nonlicensed individual who "assists" in the practice of occupational therapy and is under the "direct supervision" of a licensed occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant. KRS 319A.010(5). Read together, the Act allows nonlicensed aides to assist licensed individuals in the practice of occupational therapy. It would be absurd and contrary to the entire Occupational Therapy Act to exempt occupational therapy aides completely from the Act. Therefore, in determining the status of occupational therapy aides, you should follow the definitional section of KRS 319A.010(5) and allow the aides to assist under the direct supervision of licensed occupational therapists and assistants.

You have also questioned whether the occupational therapy aides may directly perform occupational therapy services or whether their involvement must be limited to supportive activities. It is the opinion of the Attorney General that an occupational therapy aide, by statute, may "assist" in the practice of occupational therapy if the aide is under the "direct supervision" of a licensed occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant.

LLM Summary
In OAG 92-159, the Attorney General reevaluates a previous opinion (OAG 92-60) based on new information provided, leading to minor modifications and the overruling of the previous opinion. The decision addresses the status of occupational therapy aides under Kentucky law, clarifying that they must assist under the direct supervision of licensed occupational therapists or assistants, and cannot independently perform occupational therapy services.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Type:
Opinion
Lexis Citation:
1992 Ky. AG LEXIS 274
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.