This citation is used to support the argument that a mere allegation of an unreasonable burden or intent to disrupt essential functions does not satisfy the statutory requirements. The decision cites this case to emphasize the need for clear and convincing evidence when denying open records requests on these grounds.
10-ORD-203 was Cited by 14-ORD-229
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.