14-ORD-154 is cited as a controlling precedent in the decision, where it was previously determined that an agency did not violate the Open Records Act in denying a request for investigative records in the context of a motion to set aside a conviction. The decision follows the reasoning and conclusions of 14-ORD-154 in determining that the Kentucky State Police did not violate the Open Records Act in the present case.
14-ORD-154 was Followed by 16-ORD-244
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.