22-ORD-025 is cited to provide a precedent where the Department had previously withheld intelligence analysis related to protests, claiming that revealing such information could endanger officers. This case is used to compare and contrast with the current situation involving the ShotSpotter system, where the Department claims that revealing the locations of microphones could similarly endanger officers. The decision discusses the reasoning and findings of 22-ORD-025 to assess the validity of the Department's current exemption claim under similar circumstances.
22-ORD-025 was Cited by 22-ORD-061
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.