Skip to main content

22-ORD-269

December 15, 2022

In re: Reginald Grider/Jefferson County Commonwealth’s Attorney

Summary: The Jefferson County Commonwealth’s Attorney (“the
Commonwealth’s Attorney”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the
Act”) when he withheld a record pertaining to criminal litigation under
KRS 61.878(1)(h).

Open Records Decision

On November 7, 2022, Reginald Grider (“Appellant”) requested that the
Commonwealth’s Attorney provide a copy of the grand jury transcript or audio
recordings in a case in which the Appellant was the defendant. In a timely response,
the Commonwealth’s Attorney denied the Appellant’s request on the grounds that
the requested records were records pertaining to criminal litigation, which are
exempt under KRS 61.878(1)(h). This appeal followed.

Under KRS 61.878(1)(h), “records or information compiled and maintained by
county attorneys or Commonwealth’s attorneys pertaining to criminal investigations
or criminal litigation shall be exempted from the provisions of [the Act] and shall
remain exempted after enforcement action, including litigation, is completed or a
decision is made to take no action.” Grand jury records are records pertaining to
criminal litigation. See, e.g., 17-ORD-085; 11-ORD-079; 00-ORD-116. Accordingly, the
Commonwealth’s Attorney did not violate the Act when he denied, under KRS
61.878(1)(h), the Appellant’s request for transcripts or audio recordings of the grand
jury proceedings.1

1
The Appellant argues that he is entitled to obtain the grand jury records through discovery under
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). However, the fact that a criminal defendant may obtain a
transcript of the grand jury proceedings through discovery, as permitted under RCr 5.16(3), is not
determinative of whether he may obtain it under the Act. See, e.g., 12-ORD-032; 03-ORD-126.A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the
appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882 within 30 days
from the date of this decision. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall
be notified of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that
action or in any subsequent proceedings. The Attorney General will accept notice of
the complaint e-mailed to OAGAppeals@ky.gov.

Daniel Cameron

Attorney General

s/ James M. Herrick

James M. Herrick

Assistant Attorney General

#443

Distributed to:

Reginald L. Grider, #253921
Erwin Roberts, Esq.
Thomas B. Wine, Esq.

LLM Summary
In 22-ORD-269, the Attorney General concluded that the Jefferson County Commonwealth's Attorney did not violate the Open Records Act by denying a request for grand jury transcripts or audio recordings, as these are records pertaining to criminal litigation and are exempt under KRS 61.878(1)(h). The decision also discusses the non-applicability of obtaining such records through discovery under criminal procedure to the provisions of the Open Records Act.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Reginald Grider
Agency:
Jefferson County Commonwealth’s Attorney
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.