Skip to main content

23-ORD-051

March 8, 2023

In re: Alex Burdette/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex

Summary: The Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (“the
Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it
denied a request for a record that does not contain a specific reference
to the requesting inmate.

Open Records Decision

On January 23, 2023, inmate Alex Burdette (“Appellant”) requested to inspect
the Complex’s strip search log for 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on January 12, 2023, “with
the names of inmates besides [the Appellant] redacted.” The Complex denied the
request because disclosure of the records “would constitute a threat to the security of
inmates, the institution, institutional staff, or others” under KRS 197.025(1). This
appeal followed.

On appeal, the Complex no longer relies on KRS 197.025(1) but instead cites
KRS 197.025(2), claiming the Appellant is not entitled to inspect the strip search log
because “it did not contain a specific reference to him on January 12, 2023.” Under
KRS 197.025(2), which is incorporated into the Act under KRS 61.878(1)(l), a
correctional facility need not produce records for an inmate’s inspection “unless the
request is for a record which contains a specific reference to that individual.” Here,
because the strip search log does not contain a specific reference to the Appellant on
the date specified in his request, the Complex did not violate the Act when it denied
his request.1

1
Because the Complex changed the exemption on which it relied in response to this appeal, the
Appellant has not challenged the Complex’s claim that the log does not contain a specific reference to
him. Presumably the Appellant believes that it does, given that he requested the log for a specific time
and date with all names but his own redacted. Regardless, whether the Appellant was actuallyA party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the
appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882 within 30 days
from the date of this decision. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall
be notified of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that
action or in any subsequent proceedings. The Attorney General will accept notice of
the complaint e-mailed to OAGAppeals@ky.gov.

Daniel Cameron

Attorney General

s/ James M. Herrick

James M. Herrick

Assistant Attorney General

#59

Distributed to:

Alex Burdette, #188519
Amy V. Barker, Esq.
Ms. Lydia C. Kendrick
Ms. Ann Smith

searched on the date specified in his request such that his name should appear in the log is a factual
question this Office is unable to adjudicate. See, e.g., 21-ORD-163.

LLM Summary
In 23-ORD-051, the Attorney General determined that the Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex did not violate the Open Records Act when it denied an inmate's request to inspect a strip search log that did not specifically reference him. The decision explains that under KRS 197.025(2), a correctional facility is not required to produce records for an inmate's inspection unless the record specifically references that individual. The decision also notes that the Office of the Attorney General cannot adjudicate factual disputes, such as whether the appellant's name should have been included in the log.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Alex Burdette
Agency:
Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.