Skip to main content

23-ORD-148

June 29, 2023

In re: Bobbie Coleman/Floyd County Clerk

Summary: The Floyd County Clerk (the “Clerk”) violated the Open
Records Act (“the Act”) when he failed to respond to a request to inspect
records within five business days.

Open Records Decision

On May 22, 2023, Bobbie Coleman (“Appellant”) emailed two requests to the
Clerk to inspect various records relating to the May 2023 primary elections.1 Having
received no response by May 31, 2023, the Appellant initiated this appeal.

Under KRS 61.880(1), upon receiving a request for records under the Act, a
public agency “shall determine within five (5) [business] days . . . after the receipt of
any such request whether to comply with the request and shall notify in writing the
person making the request, within the five (5) day period, of its decision.”

On appeal, the Clerk explains that, at the time he received the request, he had
“just lost one of [his] staff and when the funeral was over [he] became sick and was
unable to respond.” However, the Clerk responded to the Appellant’s request shortly
before receiving notice of this appeal. The Office has previously found that the
absence of an agency’s records custodian does not extend the deadline to respond
under KRS 61.880(1). See, e.g., 20-ORD-024; 98-ORD-161; 94-ORD-86. While the
Office is sympathetic to the Clerk’s situation and finds the reasons for his absence

1
Specifically, the Appellant sought video surveillance tapes of the election machines from 6:00 p.m.
on May 16, 2023, to 6:00 p.m. on May 17, 2023. The Appellant also sought, “in spreadsheet format (.csv
or .xlsx) [the Clerk’s] complete voter sign-in rosters for every precinct, absentee, early, and election
day voters from the May 2023 primary.”more compelling than the reasons given in previous cases, the Act nevertheless
requires a public agency to respond to every request to inspect records within five
business days of receipt. Because the Clerk did not respond to the Appellant’s
requests within five business days of receiving them, the Clerk violated the Act.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating an action in the
appropriate circuit court under KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882 within 30 days from
the date of this decision. Under KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall be notified
of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that action or in
any subsequent proceedings. The Attorney General will accept notice of the complaint
emailed to OAGAppeals@ky.gov.

Daniel Cameron

Attorney General

s/ Marc Manley

Marc Manley

Assistant Attorney General

#219

Distributed to:

Bobbie Coleman
Chris Waugh

LLM Summary
The decision in 23-ORD-148 found that the Floyd County Clerk violated the Open Records Act by failing to respond to a records request within the required five business days. The decision cites previous opinions to support the principle that the absence of a records custodian does not extend the response deadline.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Bobbie Coleman
Agency:
Floyd County Clerk
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.