Skip to main content

23-ORD-268

October 10, 2023

In re: Kenneth Tracy/Franklin County Sheriff’s Office

Summary: The Franklin County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”)
violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a
response to a request to inspect records within five business days of
receiving it.

Open Records Decision

On August 23, 2023, Kenneth Tracy (“Appellant”) submitted a request to the
Sheriff’s Office for “all reports, body cam footage, and records involving” an identified
person “within the last year.” The Appellant claims that, on September 5, 2023, the
Sheriff’s Office “contacted” him and asked what records he wanted so it could provide
them to him.1 On September 12, 2023, having received no further communication
from the Sheriff’s Office, the Appellant initiated this appeal.

Upon receiving a request for records under the Act, a public agency “shall
determine within five (5) [business] days . . . after the receipt of any such request
whether to comply with the request and shall notify in writing the person making the
request, within the five (5) day period, of its decision.” KRS 61.880(1). Here, the
Appellant claims he submitted a request for records to the Sheriff’s Office on August
23, but he did not receive any response for almost two weeks, and even then the
response was not in writing. The Appellant further claims that, as of September 12,
he had yet to receive any further response from the Sheriff’s Office. The Sheriff’s
Office carries the burden of sustaining its actions, KRS 61.880(2)(c), but has not

1
Presumably, this was not a written communication because the Appellant did not provide the
Office with a written copy. According to the Appellant, this communication did not deny the request,
but instead sought clarification of the request.explained why it did not respond in writing to the Appellant’s request within five
business days of receiving it.2 Thus, the Sheriff’s violated the Act when it failed to
respond to the Appellant's requests within five business days.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating an action in the
appropriate circuit court under KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882 within 30 days from
the date of this decision. Under KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall be notified
of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that action or in
any subsequent proceedings. The Attorney General will accept notice of the complaint
emailed to OAGAppeals@ky.gov.

Daniel Cameron

Attorney General

s/ Matthew Ray

Matthew Ray

Assistant Attorney General

#401

Distributed to:

Kenneth Tracy
Chris Quire
Max H. Comley

2
The Sheriff’s Office has not responded to the notice of appeal the Office issued on September 13,
2023.

LLM Summary
The decision in 23-ORD-268 found that the Franklin County Sheriff's Office violated the Open Records Act by failing to respond within five business days to a request for records. The office did not provide a written response to the requestor, nor did it justify its failure to respond in the required timeframe. The decision emphasizes the obligations of public agencies under the Open Records Act to respond promptly and in writing to records requests.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Kenneth Tracy
Agency:
Franklin County Sheriff’s Office
Cites:
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.