Skip to main content

23-ORD-332

December 14, 2023

In re: Elbert Long/Kentucky Parole Board

Summary: The Kentucky Parole Board (“Board”) did not violate the
Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not
exist.

Open Records Decision

Inmate Elbert Long (“Appellant”) submitted a request to the Board seeking a
copy of a transcript from his preliminary parole revocation hearing that occurred in
August 1988. In response, the Board stated it does not possess a transcript of the
Appellant’s hearing. This appeal followed.

On appeal, the Board maintains that it does not possess a transcript of the
Appellant’s hearing. Once a public agency states affirmatively that a record does not
exist, the burden shifts to the requester to present a prima facie case that the
requested record does or should exist. See Bowling v. Lexington–Fayette Urb. Cnty.
Gov’t, 172 S.W.3d 333, 341 (Ky. 2005). If the requester makes a prima facie case that
the records do or should exist, then the public agency “may also be called upon to
prove that its search was adequate.” City of Fort Thomas v. Cincinnati Enquirer, 406
S.W.3d 842, 848 n.3 (Ky. 2013) (citing Bowling, 172 S.W.3d at 341).

Here, the Appellant asserts the transcript exists because it allegedly was used
as evidence against him in his federal criminal case. But that assertion alone does
not establish a prima facie case that the Board currently possesses the transcript.1

1
The Board states that, after this appeal was initiated, it determined that a copy of the transcript
is saved in the Department of Correction’s Kentucky Offender Manager System (“KOMS”). The Board
further states that it is not the custodian of records kept in KOMS. Under KRS 61.872(4), if “the personTherefore, the Board did not violate the Act when it did not provide records it does
not possess.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating an action in the
appropriate circuit court under KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882 within 30 days from
the date of this decision. Under KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall be notified
of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that action or in
any subsequent proceedings. The Attorney General will accept notice of the complaint
emailed to OAGAppeals@ky.gov.

Daniel Cameron

Attorney General

s/ Zachary M. Zimmerer

Zachary M. Zimmerer

Assistant Attorney General

#514

Distributed to:

Elbert Phillip Long #077478
Angela D. Tolley
Seth Fawns

to whom the application is directed does not have custody or control of the public record requested,
that person shall notify the applicant and shall furnish the name and location of the official custodian
of the agency's public records.” The Board has provided the Appellant with the name and address of
the custodian of KOMS records and the custodian of court records in the Western District of Kentucky.

LLM Summary
In 23-ORD-332, the Attorney General determined that the Kentucky Parole Board did not violate the Open Records Act by failing to provide a transcript from a 1988 parole hearing that it did not possess. The decision explains that once a public agency states that a record does not exist, the burden shifts to the requester to prove otherwise. The Board found that the transcript was in the Kentucky Offender Manager System, which is not under its custody, and directed the requester to the appropriate custodian.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Elbert Long
Agency:
Kentucky Parole Board
Cites:
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.