Skip to main content

24-ORD-028

February 6, 2024

In re: Whitney Marion/Kentucky Education and Labor Cabinet

Summary: The Kentucky Education and Labor Cabinet (“Cabinet”) did
not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection
of notes under KRS 61.878(1)(i).

Open Records Decision

Whitney Marion (“Appellant”) submitted a request to the Cabinet for
“[h]earing documentation, notes, question[s] and answers recorded by the hearing
referee” related to a specific unemployment compensation hearing. In response, the
Cabinet provided some responsive records but withheld “internal notes” under
KRS 61.878(1)(i) and KRS 341.190(4).1 This appeal followed.

KRS 61.878(1)(i) exempts from disclosure “[p]reliminary drafts, notes, [and]
correspondence with private individuals, other than correspondence which is
intended to give notice of final action of a public agency.” Notes may be characterized
as records “created as an aid to memory or as a basis for a fuller statement,” such as
“shorthand notes taken at a meeting.” 05-ORD-179. Here, the Cabinet explained that
the requested notes were “intended to aid the [hearing] officer in making a final
determination following the hearing.” The Cabinet also explains that the hearing was
continued to January 31, 2024, and the requested notes were “written down as an aid
to memory” to assist the hearing officer in making a final determination following the
hearing. Thus, the records are clearly “notes” within the meaning of KRS 61.878(1)(i).
Accordingly, the Cabinet did not violate the Act when it withheld the notes under
KRS 61.878(1)(i).2

1
The Cabinet redacted parts of the responsive records under KRS 61.878(1)(a). The Appellant has
not challenged the redactions the Cabinet made. Rather, she asserts only that the Cabinet’s “internal
notes” should have been produced.
2
Because KRS 61.878(1)(i) is dispositive of the issues on appeal, it is unnecessary to address the
Cabinet’s alternative argument relating to KRS 341.190(4).A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating an action in the
appropriate circuit court under KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882 within 30 days from
the date of this decision. Under KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall be notified
of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that action or in
any subsequent proceedings. The Attorney General will accept notice of the complaint
emailed to OAGAppeals@ky.gov.

Russell Coleman

Attorney General

/s/ Zachary M. Zimmerer

Zachary M. Zimmerer

Assistant Attorney General

#012

Distributed to:

Whitney Marion
Kimberly A. Grasberger
Jamie Link

LLM Summary
In 24-ORD-028, the Kentucky Education and Labor Cabinet did not violate the Open Records Act when it denied inspection of internal notes under KRS 61.878(1)(i). The decision explains that the notes were intended to aid the hearing officer in making a final determination and thus were properly withheld under the exemption for preliminary drafts and notes.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Whitney Marion
Agency:
Kentucky Education and Labor Cabinet
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.