Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-083
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On April 13, 2020, James Harrison ("Appellant") submitted an open records request to CHFS seeking a copy of "guidelines and any other …
James Harrison — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-089
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Michelle D. Harrison,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On May 6, 2020, Shawn R. Burden ("Appellant") requested a copy of "[a]ll submissions to the 'Team Kentucky Non-Compliance …
Shawn R. Burden — Kentucky Labor Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-091
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Michelle D. Harrison,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision L. Christopher Hunt ("Appellant") requested a copy of the following public records from the Cabinet: In a timely written …
L. Christopher Hunt — Kentucky Labor Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-094
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On December 20, 2019, Department for Medicaid Services ("DMS") employee David McAnally ("Appellant") submitted an open records …
David McAnally — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-120
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Michelle D. Harrison,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On May 4, 2020, Artis Anderson ("Appellant") requested from the Cabinet fourteen categories of records that will be addressed …
Artis Anderson — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-150
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 14, 2020, Scott Thomas ("Appellant") requested that the Cabinet provide a copy of the records relating to him on file …
Scott Thomas — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-161
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Summary : The Cabinet for Health and Family Services ("Cabinet") violated the Open Records Act ("the Act") when it denied a person previously suspected of …
Jeffery Walther — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-184
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Charlie Dietz ("Appellant") requested from the Cabinet a copy of "[a]ll reports generated, logs and data collected from reports made" to …
Charlie Dietz — Kentucky Labor Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-195
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Mary Delaney ("Appellant") requested a copy of "the records attached to the birth certificate of Donald William Shain on June …
Mary Delaney — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-197
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 31, 2020, Kevin Hayes ("Appellant") requested from the Cabinet a copy of "all non-system databases/tables on the SQL Server …
Kevin Hayes — Kentucky Labor Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-204
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Summary: The Kentucky Labor Cabinet ("Cabinet") violated the Open Records Act ("the Act") when it did not issue a timely response to a request to inspect …
Thurman Wenzl — Kentucky Labor Cabinet
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.