Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-226
24-ORD-226 October 15, 2024 In re: William Sharp/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision …
William Sharp — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-227
24-ORD-227 October 21, 2024 In re: Dante Stone/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Open Records Act (“the Act”) does not apply to the Jefferson County Circuit Court Clerk (the “Clerk”). Open Records Decision On September 1, 2024, inmate Dante …
Dante Stone — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-237
24-ORD-237 November 12, 2024 In re: Alex Rib/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it required the Appellant to complete a commercial purpose form even though …
Alex Rib — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-029
25-ORD-029 January 30, 2025 In re: John Cheves/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it could not provide records that do not …
John Cheves — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-031
25-ORD-031 January 31, 2025 In re: Stephen Kininmonth/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Office cannot find that Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it claims to have provided all records …
Stephen Kininmonth — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-030
25-ORD-030 January 31, 2025 In re: Stephen Kininmonth/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that it does not possess. Metro also …
Stephen Kininmonth — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-032
25-ORD-032 February 3, 2025 In re: Ryan J. Dischinger/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response within five business days of receiving …
Ryan J. Dischinger — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-041
25-ORD-041 February 13, 2025 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response to two …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-059
25-ORD-059 March 6, 2025 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response to a request to …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-064
25-ORD-064 March 17, 2025 In re: Eric Ribenboim/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records for failure to certify a commercial purpose …
Eric Ribenboim — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-088
25-ORD-088 March 31, 2025 In re: Kaylae Price/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided all records responsive to a request and the requester did not …
Kaylae Price — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-086
25-ORD-086 March 31, 2025 In re: Ryan J. Dischinger/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it did not respond to …
Ryan J. Dischinger — Louisville Metro Government
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.