Search AG Opinions & Decisions
23-ORD-241
23-ORD-241 September 15, 2023 In re: Christopher Shaughnessy/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for emails …
Christopher Shaughnessy — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-253
23-ORD-253 September 19, 2023 In re: Bill Hollander/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records …
Bill Hollander — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-259
23-ORD-259 September 25, 2023 In re: Vivian Miles/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when a requester provided prima facie evidence …
Vivian Miles — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-292
23-ORD-292 November 1, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Metro also violated …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-318
23-ORD-318 December 5, 2023 In re: Glenn D. Odom/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Office cannot find that the Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond …
Glenn D. Odom — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-321
23-ORD-321 December 5, 2023 In re: Vivian Miles/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (the “Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not issue a timely response to a request …
Vivian Miles — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-333
23-ORD-333 December 14, 2023 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its final response …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-334
23-ORD-334 December 14, 2023 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its final response …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-341
23-ORD-341 December 18, 2023 In re: Kentucky Innocence Project/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it could not provide …
Kentucky Innocence Project — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-346
23-ORD-346 December 28, 2023 In re: Nicolas Horne/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it delayed access to …
Nicolas Horne — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-002
24-ORD-002 January 16, 2024 In re: Daniel Owens/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it entirely withheld from an unsuccessful …
Daniel Owens — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
24-ORD-008
24-OR-008 January 17, 2024 In re: Jessica Thornton/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of a privileged memorandum from its attorney to …
Jessica Thornton — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-012
24-ORD-012 January 17, 2024 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision On …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-016
24-ORD-016 January 22, 2024 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld an email that was exempt from disclosure under KRS …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-015
24-ORD-015 January 22, 2024 In re: Evan Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”) within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it delayed access to records …
Evan Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-035
24-ORD-035 February 14, 2024 In re: Rachana Pradhan/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld records that were …
Rachana Pradhan — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-089
24-ORD-089 April 1, 2024 In re: Vivian Miles/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request as too imprecise under KRS …
Vivian Miles — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-179
24-ORD-179 August 13, 2024 In re: Kristian Childers/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (the “Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld records under KRS …
Kristian Childers — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-192
24-ORD-192 September 10, 2024 In re: Nicholas Horne/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS …
Nicholas Horne — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-214
24-ORD-214 October 3, 2024 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Record Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records it does not …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.