Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
18-ORD-136
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;J. Marcus Jones,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The issue presented in this appeal is whether the City of Cynthiana ("City") violated the Open Records Act when it did not respond to …
David Fuller — City of Cynthiana
23-ORD-019
23-ORD-019 January 31, 2023 In re: Jeremy Bryant/City of London Summary: The City of London (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond timely to a request for records. Open Records Decision On December 19, 2022, …
Jeremy Bryant — City of London
23-ORD-110
23-ORD-110 May 22, 2023 In re: William Michael Fields, Jr./City of Cynthiana Summary: This Office cannot find that the City of Cynthiana (the “City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to requests it did not receive. …
Michael Fields, Jr. — City of Cynthiana
24-OMD-026
24-OMD-026 February 6, 2024 In re: Douglas Phelps/City of London Summary: Because the Open Meetings Act (“the Act”) does not entitle any member of the public to be heard at a public meeting, the City of London (“the City”) did not violate the Act …
Douglas Phelps — City of London
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-082
25-ORD-082 March 28, 2025 In re: Brandon Voelker/City of London Summary: The Office cannot find that the City of London (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve the factual dispute between the parties. …
Brandon Voelker — City of London
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-124
25-ORD-124 May 15, 2025 In re: Bobby Ellison/City of London Summary: The City of London (“the City”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide a copy of a record to a county resident prior to his inspection of the …
Bobby Ellison — City of London
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-144
25-ORD-144 June 4, 2025 In re: Jason O’Bannon/City of London Summary: The City of London (“the City”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it stated that it does not possess records responsive to the Appellant’s request and …
Jason O’Bannon — City of London
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-139
25-ORD-139 May 27, 2025 In re: Bobby Ellison/City of London Summary: The Office cannot find that the City of London (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to resolve the factual dispute between the …
Bobby Ellison — City of London
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.