Search AG Opinions & Decisions
24-ORD-010
24-ORD-010 January 17, 2024 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown Summary: Under 40 KAR 1:030 § 4, the Attorney General may not reconsider a decision rendered under the Open Records Act (“the Act”). The Office will not reconsider 23-ORD-301, in which …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown
24-ORD-059
24-ORD-059 March 8, 2024 In re: Bradley McMahan/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Office cannot find that the Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (the “Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is …
Bradley McMahan — Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-090
24-ORD-090 April 3, 2024 In re: Carlos Harris/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (“Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. …
Carlos Harris — Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-203
24-ORD-203 September 24, 2024 In re: Shiann Sharpe/City of Georgetown Summary: The City of Georgetown (the “City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request for records within five business days of receiving it. …
Shiann Sharpe — City of Georgetown
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-253
24-ORD-253 November 26, 2024 In re: Lucius Adams/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (the “Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an inmate’s request for a copy …
Lucius Adams — Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.