Search AG Opinions & Decisions
22-ORD-198
22-ORD-198 September 29, 2022 In re: Rusty Weddle/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records the release of which …
Rusty Weddle — Kentucky State Penitentiary
22-ORD-223
22-ORD-223 October 20, 2022 In re: Rodney Smith/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it redacted information that, if released, would pose a …
Rodney Smith — Kentucky State Penitentiary
22-ORD-256
22-ORD-256 December 5, 2022 In re: Tami Bauer/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open Records …
Tami Bauer — Kentucky State Penitentiary
22-ORD-266
22-ORD-266 December 13, 2022 In re: Nashawn Tyus/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied requests for records that are prohibited from …
Nashawn Tyus — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-016
23-ORD-016 January 30, 2023 In re: Kim Underwood/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it redacted pages of requested records without explaining how the …
Kim Underwood — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-027
23-ORD-027 February 7, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: This Office cannot find the Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided what the requester considers …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-037
23-ORD-037 February 16, 2023 In re: Eric Hermansen/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: To invoke the Attorney General’s statutory authority to review an agency’s response to a request submitted under the Open Records Act (“the Act”), the requester …
Eric Hermansen — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-062
23-ORD-062 March 20, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: This Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provides proof it timely issued …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-069
23-ORD-069 March 27, 2023 In re: Deon’tae Williams/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist in its …
Deon’tae Williams — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-089
23-ORD-089 April 18, 2023 In re: Corey Wooley/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request under KRS 197.025(1) for security …
Corey Wooley — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-105
23-ORD-105 May 8, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it issued a timely response to a request to inspect records. …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-111
23-ORD-111 May 22, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not subvert the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it …
Lawrence Trageser — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-186
23-ORD-186 July 26, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office is unable to find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request for …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-193
23-ORD-193 August 1, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to resolve the …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-262
23-ORD-262 October 2, 2023 In re: Antonio Dionte Williamson Trust/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that does …
Antonio Dionte Williamson Trust — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-270
23-ORD-270 October 10, 2023 In re: Eric Lloyd Hermansen/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that does not contain …
Eric Lloyd Hermansen — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-302
23-ORD-302 November 13, 2023 In re: Lewis Davenport/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open Records …
Lewis Davenport — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-319
23-ORD-319 December 5, 2023 In re: Glenn D. Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because it cannot resolve the factual …
Glenn D. Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-348
23-ORD-348 December 28, 2023 In re: John Cheves/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it sought …
John Cheves — Department of Corrections
24-ORD-006
24-ORD-006 January 16, 2024 In re: Reginald Grider/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“Penitentiary”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its …
Reginald Grider — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.