Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
19-ORD-039
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Gordon Slone,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The issue presented in this appeal is whether Lee Adjustment Center ("LAC") violated the Open Records Act in its disposition of the open …
Rodney Bixler and Eugene Jackson — Lee Adjustment Center
Open Records Decision —
19-ORD-066
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General,Michelle D. Harrison,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether Lee Adjustment Center ("LAC") violated the Open Records Act in the disposition …
Derek McStoots — Lee Adjustment Center
Open Records Decision —
19-ORD-075
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Office of the Attorney General in a premature open records appeal, and the Attorney General …
Johnny Phillips — Lee Adjustment Center
Open Records Decision —
19-ORD-104
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;J. Marcus Jones,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The issues presented in this appeal are whether Lee Adjustment Center ("LAC") violated the Open Records Act in failing to issue a …
Michael Fugate — Lee Adjustment Center
Open Records Decision —
19-ORD-143
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Sarah Ellen Eads Adkins,Assistant Attorney General Summary : The Louisville Metro Department of Corrections appropriately denied the inmate's request per KRS 197.025(2) because he requested records …
Bobby Brock — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
19-ORD-150
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Michelle D. Harrison,Assistant Attorney General Summary : Lee Adjustment Center did not violate the Open Records Act in denying a request for a nonexistent record, and was not required to "prove a …
JaQue Abrams — Lee Adjustment Center
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-202
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Darryn B. Sharber ("Appellant") claims that on September 2, 2020, he requested from the Department a copy of the negatives of x-rays …
Darryn B. Sharber — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-043
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision WAVE 3 News ("Appellant") requested from the Department a copy of a surveillance video that purportedly depicts a physical altercation …
WAVE 3 News — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-038
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On January 14, 2022, attorney Alan Rubin ("Appellant") requested copies of all surveillance footage from the Department showing …
Alan Rubin — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-049
Opinion Opinion By: Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Summary : The Louisville Metro Department of Corrections (the "Department") violated the Open Records Act ("the Act") when it failed to issue a response to a request to inspect records …
Glenn Odom — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-076
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On March 18, 2022, Josh Wood ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Department for "[a]ll 'inmate grievance forms' submitted by …
Josh Wood — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
23-ORD-045
23-ORD-045 February 27, 2023 In re: Leonel Martinez/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (“the Center”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do not reference the Appellant. …
Leonel Martinez — Lee Adjustment Center
23-ORD-090
23-ORD-090 April 18, 2023 In re: Leonel Martinez/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (the “Center”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that no longer existed within its …
Leonel Martinez — Lee Adjustment Center
23-ORD-094
23-ORD-094 April 26, 2023 In re: Leonel Martinez/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (the “Center”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not review responsive records to determine if its stated exceptions …
Leonel Martinez — Lee Adjustment Center
23-ORD-166
23-ORD-166 July 11, 2023 In re: Johnny Lee Cissell/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (the “Center”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when its response failed to properly invoke KRS 61.872(5) to delay access to the …
Johnny Lee Cissell — Lee Adjustment Center
23-ORD-308
23-ORD-308 November 14, 2023 In re: Anthony Sadler/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (“the Center”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records it does not possess. Open Records …
Anthony Sadler — Lee Adjustment Center
23-ORD-347
23-ORD-347 December 28, 2023 In re: Jerry D. Lotz/Louisville Metro Department of Corrections Summary: Louisville Metro Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an inmate’s request …
Jerry D. Lotz — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
24-ORD-055
24-ORD-055 March 8, 2024 In re: Timothy Arnold/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (“the Center”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that, if released, could pose a security …
Timothy Arnold — Lee Adjustment Center
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-127
24-ORD-127 May 24, 2024 In re: Donald Phillips/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (“Center”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records without citing a specific exemption to justify its …
Donald Phillips — Lee Adjustment Center
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-182
24-ORD-182 August 21, 2024 In re: Laron Cobb/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (“the Center”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a portion of a request. However, the Center did not violate …
Laron Cobb — Lee Adjustment Center
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.