Search AG Opinions & Decisions
24-ORD-008
24-OR-008 January 17, 2024 In re: Jessica Thornton/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of a privileged memorandum from its attorney to …
Jessica Thornton — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-012
24-ORD-012 January 17, 2024 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision On …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-016
24-ORD-016 January 22, 2024 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld an email that was exempt from disclosure under KRS …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-015
24-ORD-015 January 22, 2024 In re: Evan Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”) within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it delayed access to records …
Evan Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-041
24-ORD-041 February 20, 2024 In re: Gabrielle Lehrmann/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request to inspect records …
Gabrielle Lehrmann — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-131
24-ORD-131 May 31, 2024 In re: Jacob Ryan/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (the “Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it issued responses that failed to explain how the cited …
Jacob Ryan — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-137
24-ORD-137 June 12, 2024 In re: Makeda Charles/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records it does not …
Makeda Charles — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-226
24-ORD-226 October 15, 2024 In re: William Sharp/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision …
William Sharp — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-227
24-ORD-227 October 21, 2024 In re: Dante Stone/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Open Records Act (“the Act”) does not apply to the Jefferson County Circuit Court Clerk (the “Clerk”). Open Records Decision On September 1, 2024, inmate Dante …
Dante Stone — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-237
24-ORD-237 November 12, 2024 In re: Alex Rib/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it required the Appellant to complete a commercial purpose form even though …
Alex Rib — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-256
24-ORD-256 December 3, 2024 In re: Jared Bennett/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (the “Department”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request …
Jared Bennett — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-258
24-ORD-258 December 5, 2024 In re: Eric Anthony/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records within …
Eric Anthony — Louisville Metro Police Department
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.