Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-097
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On March 5, 2021, Lawrence Trageser ("Appellant") asked Metro for a copy of a specific police officer's personnel file. Having …
Lawrence Trageser — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-150
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On June 8, 2021, The Courier-Journal ("Appellant") requested "[a]ny completed Human Resources investigation into [a named …
The Courier-Journal — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-255
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On November 4, 2021, inmate Chris Hawkins ("Appellant") requested copies of all documents relating to Prison Rape Elimination …
Chris Hawkins — Western Kentucky Correctional Complex
22-ORD-196
22-ORD-196 September 29, 2022 In re: Gustavo Andres/Western Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Western Kentucky Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records posing …
Gustavo Andres — Western Kentucky Correctional Complex
22-ORD-195
22-ORD-195 September 29, 2022 In re: Jose Menjivar/Western Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Western Kentucky Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records posing …
Jose Menjivar — Western Kentucky Correctional Complex
22-ORD-225
22-ORD-225 October 21, 2022 In re: Samuel Turner/Western Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Western Kentucky Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records which, if …
Samuel Turner — Western Kentucky Correctional Complex
22-ORD-268
22-ORD-268 December 15, 2022 In re: Josh Wood/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond within five business days to three of seven requests it …
Josh Wood — Louisville Metro Government
22-ORD-273
22-ORD-273 December 19, 2022 In re: Matthew Bunnell/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a timely written response to a request to inspect …
Matthew Bunnell — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-007
23-ORD-007 January 18, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/ Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision …
Lawrence Trageser — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-038
23-ORD-038 February 20, 2023 In re: Alan Rubin / Louisville Metro Government Summary: Because the requester has made a prima facie case that a public record should exist, Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the …
Alan Rubin — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-087
23-ORD-087 April 17, 2023 In re: Western States Media/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for automobile collision reports under KRS …
Western States Media — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-135
23-ORD-135 June 13, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to make a timely response to two open records requests. Open …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-138
23-ORD-138 June 20, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue responses within five business days of receiving requests …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-176
23-ORD-176 July 19, 2023 In re: James Hightower/Western Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Western Kentucky Correctional Complex (the “Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”), or subvert the intent of the Act within the …
James Hightower — Western Kentucky Correctional Complex
23-ORD-207
23-ORD-207 August 9, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld a “preliminary draft” under KRS 61.878(1)(i). Open Records …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-253
23-ORD-253 September 19, 2023 In re: Bill Hollander/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records …
Bill Hollander — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-257
23-ORD-257 September 25, 2023 In re: Jacob Brannon/Western Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Western Kentucky Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not fulfill a request for …
Jacob Brannon — Western Kentucky Correctional Complex
23-ORD-290
23-ORD-290 October 31, 2023 In re: Leslie Haun/Western Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Western Kentucky Correctional Complex (the “Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not deliver the requested records to …
Leslie Haun — Western Kentucky Correctional Complex
23-ORD-292
23-ORD-292 November 1, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Metro also violated …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-333
23-ORD-333 December 14, 2023 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its final response …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.