Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
16-ORD-014
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the University of Kentucky violated the Open Records Act in its disposition of Dr. …
Lachin Hatemi — University of Kentucky
Open Records Decision —
16-ORD-134
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Amye L. Bensenhaver,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Lachin Hatemi appeals the University of Kentucky's denial of his April 16, 2016, request for "[a]ny documents/agreements/contracts …
Lachin Hatemi — University of Kentucky
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-212
24-ORD-212 September 27 2024 In re: Sarah Thomas/University of Kentucky Summary: The University of Kentucky (the “University”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to grant or deny a request made under the Act within five …
Sarah Thomas — University of Kentucky
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-077
25-ORD-077 March 24, 2025 In re: Sarah Thomas/University of Kentucky Summary: The University of Kentucky (“the University”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld confidential attorney-client communications under KRE …
Sarah Thomas — University of Kentucky
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-076
25-ORD-076 March 24, 2025 In re: Sarah Thomas/University of Kentucky Summary: The University of Kentucky (“the University”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to grant or deny requests for records within five business days and …
Sarah Thomas — University of Kentucky
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.