Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
15-ORD-218
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Kentucky State Police (KSP) violated the Open Records Act in its disposition of …
Joshua Powell — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
17-ORD-200
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Office of Montgomery County Sheriff violated the Open Records Act in the …
Joshua Powell — Office of Montgomery County Sheriff
Open Records Decision —
18-ORD-211
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Division of Community Corrections …
Joshua Powell — Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Division of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
19-ORD-090
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Sarah Ellen Eads Adkins,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision At issue in this appeal is whether the Montgomery County Sheriff's Office violated the Open Records Act in denying Joshua …
Joshua Powell — Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
19-ORD-094
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Sarah Ellen Eads Adkins,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented on appeal is whether Radcliff Police Department violated the Open Records Act when it failed to respond …
Joshua Powell — Radcliff Police Department
Open Records Decision —
19-ORD-116
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in these consolidated appeals is whether the Radcliff Police Department ("RPD") violated the Open Records Act …
Joshua Powell — Radcliff Police Department
Open Records Decision —
19-ORD-138
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;J. Marcus Jones,Assistant Attorney General Summary : The Radcliff Police Department ("RPD") initially failed to provide any explanation for the nonexistence of responsive records as required by the …
Joshua Powell — Radcliff Police Department
Open Records Decision —
19-ORD-141
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Gordon Slone,Assistant Attorney General Summary : Radcliff Police Department violated the Open Records Act by failing to affirmatively deny the existence of requested records. Police Department …
Joshua Powell — Radcliff Police Department
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-124
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 8, 2020, Joshua Powell ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Department to inspect records in-person at the Department. …
Joshua Powell — Lexington Police Department
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-023
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron Attorney General; Marc Manley Assistant Attorney General Summary : The Office of the State Medical Examiner ("Medical Examiner") did not violate the Open Records Act (the "Act") when it denied a request for records …
Joshua Powell — Office of the State Medical Examiner
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-118
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General; Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Joshua Powell ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Department for "CAD entries, calls for service by and any other 'Code 17's'" …
Joshua Powell — Lexington Police Department
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-148
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Joshua Powell ("Appellant") has sought the same record from three separate public agencies, with each public agency denying his request …
Joshua Powell — Fayette County Coroner’s Office
23-ORD-018
23-ORD-018 January 31, 2023 In re: Joshua Powell/Lexington Police Department Summary: The Lexington Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when its initial response to a request failed to explain how KRS …
Joshua Powell — Lexington Police Department
23-ORD-025
23-ORD-025 February 2, 2023 In re: Joshua Powell/Lexington Police Department Summary: The Lexington Police Department (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of a video recording of a field …
Joshua Powell — Lexington Police Department
23-ORD-115
23-ORD-115 May 30, 2023 In re: Alastair Couch/Franklin County Commonwealth’s Attorney Summary: This Office cannot find that the Franklin County Commonwealth’s Attorney (the “Commonwealth’s Attorney”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when he …
Alastair Couch — Franklin County Commonwealth’s Attorney
23-ORD-114
23-ORD-114 May 30, 2023 In re: Alastair Couch/Fayette County Commonwealth’s Attorney Summary: This Office cannot find that the Fayette County Commonwealth’s Attorney (the “Commonwealth’s Attorney”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when she …
Alastair Couch — Fayette County Commonwealth’s Attorney
23-ORD-224
23-ORD-224 August 21, 2023 In re: Alastair Couch/Fayette County Commonwealth’s Attorney Summary: The Fayette County Commonwealth’s Attorney (“the Commonwealth’s Attorney”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when she withheld records …
Alastair Couch — Fayette County Commonwealth’s Attorney
23-ORD-344
23-ORD-344 December 28, 2023 In re: Joshua Powell/Hardin County Detention Center Summary: The Hardin County Detention Center (“the Jail”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for copies of inmate recordings that …
Joshua Powell — Hardin County Detention Center
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.