Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
11-ORD-075
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Office of the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General …
Anthony Sadler — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-064
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On or about February 18, 2020, NTC inmate Anthony Sadler ("Appellant") attempted to submit a written request to inspect his medical …
Anthony Sadler — Northpoint Training Center
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-051
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Inmate Anthony Sadler ("Appellant") requested a copy of all correspondence between himself and the deputy warden at another …
Anthony Sadler — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-118
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On April 4, 2022, Inmate Anthony Sadler ("Appellant") submitted a standard health information request form to the Complex to view his …
Anthony Sadler — Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-145
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On May 17, 2022, Dennis Bell ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Sheriff's Office to inspect various records related to the …
Dennis Bell — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-199
22-ORD-199 September 29, 2022 In re: Anthony Sadler/Little Sandy Correctional Complex Summary: The Little Sandy Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide copies of e-mails to which …
Anthony Sadler — Little Sandy Correctional Complex
22-ORD-206
22-ORD-206 October 7, 2022 In re: Dennis Bell/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not issue a timely response to a request to …
Dennis Bell — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-229
22-ORD-229 October 25, 2022 In re: Dennis Bell/McCracken County Coroner’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Coroner’s Office (“the Coroner’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records …
Dennis Bell — McCracken County Coroner’s Office
22-ORD-249
22-ORD-249 November 21, 2022 In re: Dennis Bell/McCracken County Regional Jail Summary: The McCracken County Regional Jail (“the Jail”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for certain incident reports and …
Dennis Bell — McCracken County Regional Jail
23-ORD-099
23-ORD-099 May 1, 2023 In re: Dennis Bell/McCracken Circuit Court Clerk Summary: The Open Records Act (“the Act”) does not apply to records of the McCracken Circuit Court Clerk (“the Clerk”). Open Records Decision Dennis Bell (“Appellant”) asked the …
Dennis Bell — McCracken Circuit Court Clerk
23-ORD-098
23-ORD-098 May 1, 2023 In re: Dennis Bell/McCracken County Judge-Executive Summary: The McCracken County Judge-Executive did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when he directed the Appellant to the official custodian of the requested …
Dennis Bell — McCracken County Judge-Executive
23-ORD-308
23-ORD-308 November 14, 2023 In re: Anthony Sadler/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (“the Center”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records it does not possess. Open Records …
Anthony Sadler — Lee Adjustment Center
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.