Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-197
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On September 2, 2021, LaRue County Constable Matt Tucker ("Appellant") requested access to six hours of surveillance footage …
Matt Tucker — LaRue County Detention Center
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-208
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On September 21, 2021, Matt Tucker ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Center for copies of "phone records for the [Center] for …
Matt Tucker — LaRue County Detention Center
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-243
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On August 30, 2021, Matt Tucker ("Appellant") requested a copy of the Detention Center's "Commissary account payable/receivable …
Matt Tucker — LaRue County Detention Center
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-124
25-ORD-124 May 15, 2025 In re: Bobby Ellison/City of London Summary: The City of London (“the City”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide a copy of a record to a county resident prior to his inspection of the …
Bobby Ellison — City of London
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-139
25-ORD-139 May 27, 2025 In re: Bobby Ellison/City of London Summary: The Office cannot find that the City of London (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to resolve the factual dispute between the …
Bobby Ellison — City of London
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.