Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
00-ORD-193
Request By: [NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL] Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records …
Buster Chandler — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
11-ORD-119
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Michelle D. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision At issue in this appeal is whether Kentucky State Reformatory violated the Kentucky Open Records Act in the disposition of …
Buster Chandler — Kentucky State Reformatory
Open Records Decision —
15-ORD-004
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway,Attorney General;Amye L. Bensenhaver,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Buster Chandler appeals Kentucky State Reformatory's denial of three requests he submitted on November 17, 2014, for: .a list of …
Buster Chandler — Kentucky State Reformatory
Open Records Decision —
15-ORD-027
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway,Attorney General;Michelle D. Harrison,Assistant General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Kentucky Department of Corrections violated the Kentucky Open Records Act in denying …
Buster Chandler — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
15-ORD-036
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway,Attorney General;Amye L. Bensenhaver,Assistant Attorney General Summary : Transportation Cabinet's unsuccessful search for all information relating to a boat identified by registration number, using search method …
Buster Chandler — Transportation Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
15-ORD-220
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway,Attorney General;Michelle D. Harrison,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Buster Chandler initiated this appeal challenging the denial by the Kentucky State Reformatory (KSR) of his October 15, 2015, …
Buster Chandler — Kentucky State Reformatory
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-211
24-ORD-211 September 27, 2024 In re: Buster Chandler/Department of Public Advocacy Summary: The Department of Public Advocacy (the “Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request it claims it did …
Buster Chandler — Department of Public Advocacy
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-032
25-ORD-032 February 3, 2025 In re: Ryan J. Dischinger/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response within five business days of receiving …
Ryan J. Dischinger — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-086
25-ORD-086 March 31, 2025 In re: Ryan J. Dischinger/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it did not respond to …
Ryan J. Dischinger — Louisville Metro Government
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.