Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
00-ORD-111
Request By: [NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL] Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the City of Louisville …
David Leightty — City of Louisville
Open Records Decision —
01-ORD-246
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Education Professional Standards Board violated the Open Records …
David Leightty — Education Professional Standards Board
Open Records Decision —
03-ORD-243
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government violated the Open …
David Leightty — Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
05-ORD-078
Opinion Opinion By: Gregory D. Stumbo, Attorney General; Michelle D. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision At issue in this appeal is whether the Louisville Metro Police Department violated the Kentucky Open Records Act in …
David Leightty — Louisville Metro Police Department
23-ORD-301
23-ORD-301 November 6, 2023 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown Summary: The City of Georgetown (“the City”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of notes under KRS 61.878(1)(i). Open Records Decision On …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown
24-ORD-010
24-ORD-010 January 17, 2024 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown Summary: Under 40 KAR 1:030 § 4, the Attorney General may not reconsider a decision rendered under the Open Records Act (“the Act”). The Office will not reconsider 23-ORD-301, in which …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown
Open Meetings Decision —
24-OMD-218
24-OMD-218 October 4, 2024 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown and Scott County Fiscal Court Summary: The Office lacks jurisdiction to consider a complaint alleging the City of Georgetown (“the City”) and the Scott County Fiscal Court (“the Fiscal …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown and Scott County Fiscal Court
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.