Search AG Opinions & Decisions
24-ORD-010
24-ORD-010 January 17, 2024 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown Summary: Under 40 KAR 1:030 § 4, the Attorney General may not reconsider a decision rendered under the Open Records Act (“the Act”). The Office will not reconsider 23-ORD-301, in which …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown
Open Meetings Decision —
24-OMD-218
24-OMD-218 October 4, 2024 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown and Scott County Fiscal Court Summary: The Office lacks jurisdiction to consider a complaint alleging the City of Georgetown (“the City”) and the Scott County Fiscal Court (“the Fiscal …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown and Scott County Fiscal Court
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-245
24-ORD-245 November 22, 2024 In re: Eric Bunzow/City of Elsmere Summary: The City of Elsmere (“the City”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it could not provide records not within its possession, custody, or control. Open Records …
Eric Bunzow — City of Elsmere
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-246
24-ORD-246 November 22, 2024 In re: Eric Bunzow/Elsmere City Councilwoman Summary: A member of the Elsmere City Council (“the Councilwoman”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when she denied a request that did not seek records …
Eric Bunzow — Elsmere City Councilwoman
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.