Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Meetings Decision —
12-OMD-140
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the University of Louisville's University Student Grievance Committee ("USGC") …
J. Fox DeMoisey — University of Louisville
Open Meetings Decision —
13-OMD-012
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the University of Louisville's Residency Review Committee ("RRC") violated the …
J. Fox DeMoisey — University of Louisville
Open Meetings Decision —
13-OMD-037
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the University of Louisville's Arts and Sciences Student Grievance Committee …
J. Fox DeMoisey — University of Louisville
Open Meetings Decision —
13-OMD-040
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the University of Louisville's Brandeis Law School Academic Grievance Committee …
J. Fox DeMoisey — University of Louisville
Open Meetings Decision —
13-OMD-047
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The threshold question presented in this appeal is whether the University of Louisville's Brandeis School of Law Honor Council …
J. Fox DeMoisey — University of Louisville
Open Meetings Decision —
17-OMD-160
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Michelle D. Harrison,Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision J. Fox DeMoisey initiated this Open Meetings Appeal by letter dated July 26, 2017, challenging the denial by the Kentucky Board …
J. Fox DeMoisey — Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure
23-ORD-301
23-ORD-301 November 6, 2023 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown Summary: The City of Georgetown (“the City”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of notes under KRS 61.878(1)(i). Open Records Decision On …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown
24-ORD-010
24-ORD-010 January 17, 2024 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown Summary: Under 40 KAR 1:030 § 4, the Attorney General may not reconsider a decision rendered under the Open Records Act (“the Act”). The Office will not reconsider 23-ORD-301, in which …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown
Open Meetings Decision —
24-OMD-218
24-OMD-218 October 4, 2024 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown and Scott County Fiscal Court Summary: The Office lacks jurisdiction to consider a complaint alleging the City of Georgetown (“the City”) and the Scott County Fiscal Court (“the Fiscal …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown and Scott County Fiscal Court
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.